Nazgol Ghandnoosh’s recent publications include:
“Cell Phones and 'Excessive Contact': The Contradictory Imperatives Facing California’s Parole-Eligible Lifers.” Criminal Justice Policy Review. May 2018. [link to journal article]
This article explores whether and how parole boards encourage people serving parole-eligible life sentences (“lifers”) to maintain ties to friends and family outside of prison, and the results of such encouragement. Interviews, ethnographic fieldwork, and parole-hearing transcripts reveal that California’s parole board encourages such rehabilitative ties through comments at parole hearings and through its parole-eligibility criteria. But to sustain these relationships, some lifers engage in misconduct to bypass restrictive prison policies by using contraband cell phones or engaging in physical contact with visitors that is deemed “excessive.” When detected, these disciplinary infractions become a stated cause of parole denials.
“Can We Wait 75 Years to Cut the Prison Population in Half?” Washington, D.C.: The Sentencing Project. March 2018. [link to brief]
By 2016, 42 states had at least modestly downsized their prison populations from their peak levels in the last two decades. Six states—New Jersey, Alaska, New York, Vermont, Connecticut, and California—lead the nation in reducing their prison populations by 25% or more. But the nationwide pace of decarceration has been modest, 6% since a 2009 peak. If states and the federal government maintain this pace of decarceration, it will take 75 years—until 2093—to cut the U.S. prison population by 50%.
“Opioids: Treating an Illness, Ending a War” (with Casey Anderson). Washington, D.C.: The Sentencing Project. December 2017. [link to report]
More people died from opioid-related deaths in 2015 than in any previous year. This record number quadrupled the level of such deaths in 1999. Drawing on lessons from past drug crises and the evidence supporting a public health approach, this report guides policymakers as they seek an end to the current opioid crisis—without revamping the failed and costly War on Drugs. The four major recommendations include: 1) End Overprescribing of Opioids; 2) Expand Access to Treatment for Drug Use Disorders; 3) Reduce Overdose Deaths through Harm-Reduction Measures, and; 4) End the Drug War. Related: Op-Ed in Newsweek.
“Minimizing the Maximum: The Case for Shortening All Prison Sentences.” In Smart Decarceration: Achieving Criminal Justice Transformation in the 21st Century (Edited by C. Pettus-Davis & M. Epperson). New York: Oxford University Press. 2017. [link to chapter]
This chapter demonstrates the impossibility of achieving meaningful decarceration, such as halving the current prison population, without reducing penalties for serious and violent crimes. Drawing on past research, it shows how prolonged sentences produce diminishing returns for public safety while tying up resources that could be used for crime prevention, drug treatment, and reentry programs. It concludes with three policy recommendations: establish a 20-year upper limit on prison sentences, depoliticize and professionalize the parole process for life sentences, and develop a meaningful geriatric release policy.
“Federal Prisons at a Crossroads.” Washington, D.C.: The Sentencing Project. June 2017. [link to briefing paper]
Since reaching a peak in 2013, the federal prison population declined 13% by the close of 2016—twice the national rate of decarceration. This brief argues that recent policy changes by Attorney General Jeff Sessions and certain Congressional proposals are poised to reverse this progress.
“U.S. Prison Population Trends 1999-2015: Modest Reductions with Significant Variation.” Washington, D.C.: The Sentencing Project. May 2016. [link to fact sheet]
In the last fifteen years, incarceration trends have varied widely throughout the United States. This fact sheet reveals while 38 states have experienced a decline since reaching their peak prison populations within the past 15 years, in most states this decline has been relatively modest. In addition, 12 states have had continuing rises in imprisonment. Media coverage: The Santa Fe New Mexican.
“Immigration and Public Safety” (with Josh Rovner). Washington, D.C.: The Sentencing Project. March 2017. [link to report]
Based on a survey of key research, this report argues that policies further restricting immigration are ineffective crime-control strategies because foreign-born residents of the United States commit crime less often than native-born citizens. The report highlights four key findings about the recent impact of immigrants in the United States: 1) Immigrants—regardless of legal status—commit crimes at lower rates than native-born citizens; 2) Higher levels of immigration in recent decades may have contributed to the historic drop in crime rates; 3) Police chiefs believe that intensifying immigration enforcement undermines public safety; and 4) Immigrants are under-represented in U.S. prisons. Related: Op-Ed in The Hill. Media coverage: The Hill and The Washington Post.
Over the past three decades many legislatures, governors, and parole boards have toughened “lifer” parole policies and practices—effectively increasing prison terms for the more than 110,000 individuals serving parole-eligible life sentences. In eight jurisdictions for which data are available since the 1980s, average time served by paroled lifers with murder convictions doubled from 11.6 years for those paroled in the 1980s to 23.2 years for those paroled between 2000 and 2013. Drawing on a national survey in which 31 states and the federal government provided data for available years since 1980, the report identifies four factors driving this growth in prison terms and concludes by recommending reforms to depoliticize the parole process and reverse the excessive growth in prison sentences. This is a critical goal because ”curbing excessive imprisonment for parole-eligible lifers is a crucial step toward ending mass incarceration.” Related: Op-Ed in The Washington Post and webinar by The Sentencing Project. Media coverage: Truthout and The Baltimore Sun.
“Black Lives Matter: Eliminating Racial Inequity in the Criminal Justice System.” Washington, D.C.: The Sentencing Project. February 2015. [link to report]
This report identifies four key features of the criminal justice system that produce racially unequal outcomes, beyond the conditions of socioeconomic inequality that contribute to higher rates of some crimes in marginalized communities, and showcases initiatives to abate these sources of inequity in adult and juvenile justice systems around the country. Related: post on the American Constitution Society blog and video of talk at Boston University School of Public Health.
“Support Grows to End Excessive Punishment.” The Daily Journal. November 14, 2014. [link to column]
The success of California’s Proposition 47 — the ballot initiative that reduces penalties for drug possession and certain property crimes — may mark a new day for criminal justice reform. But as encouraging as this reform is, California must take even bolder steps to tackle its high rate of incarceration.
“Life, with a Possibility of Blocked Parole.” The Daily Journal. September 25, 2014. [link to column]
California is among a handful of states that allow the governor to reverse the decisions of a governor-appointed parole board. This column explains why California should end gubernatorial parole review.
“Race and Punishment: Racial Perceptions of Crime and Support for Punitive Policies.” Washington, D.C.: The Sentencing Project. September 2014. [link to report]
This report synthesizes two decades of research revealing that white Americans’ strong association of crime with African Americans and Latinos is related to their support for punitive policies that disproportionately impact people of color. The prevalence of racial associations of crime, even among whites who explicitly endorse racial equality, helps to explain why whites are more punitive than African Americans and Latinos while being far less likely to be victims of crime. Crime rates, media representation, and the work of policymakers and criminal justice practitioners contribute to the exaggerated association of crime with people of color. The report recommends proven interventions for the media, policymakers, and criminal justice professionals to reduce racial perceptions of crime and mitigate their effects on the justice system. These include addressing disparities in crime reporting, reducing the severity and disparate impact of criminal sentencing, and tackling racial bias in the formal policies and discretionary decisions of criminal justice practitioners. Related: post on the American Psychological Association blog, webinar by The Sentencing Project, and video of talk at the American Bar Association. Media coverage: The New York Times and WNYC’s On the Media.
“Fewer Prisoners, Less Crime: A Tale of Three States” (with Marc Mauer). Washington, D.C.: The Sentencing Project. July 2014. [link to briefing paper]
This briefing paper profiles the experiences of three states – New York, New Jersey, and California – that have reduced their prison populations by about 25% in the past decade while seeing their crime rates generally decline at a faster pace than the national average. Related: Op-Ed in The Crime Report .
“Can We Wait 88 Years to End Mass Incarceration?” (with Marc Mauer). The Huffington Post. December 20, 2013. [link to post]
The size of the US prison population has been declining every year since 2010, after 37 years of consecutive growth. This post argues that: “The break in the prison population's unremitting growth offers an overdue reprieve and a cause for hope for sustained reversal of the nearly four-decade growth pattern. But any optimism needs to be tempered by the very modest rate of decline, 1.8 percent in the past year. At this rate, it will take until 2101 -- 88 years -- for the prison population to return to its 1980 level.”
Nazgol Ghandnoosh’s past research has focused on race and ethnicity in the United States. She has written about the relationship between race and culture, the role of ethnicity in labor organizing, and ethnic exclusion in immigration law.
“‘Cross-Cultural’ Practices: Interpreting Non-African-American Participation in Hip-Hop Dance.” Ethnic and Racial Studies (2010) 33(9): 1580 - 1599. [link to article]
Abstract: This article examines how participants interpret a cultural practice commonly associated with a race other than their own. Determining if, how and why participants experience such ‘cross-cultural’ forms in racialized terms can clarify whether these practices promote tolerance or essentialism in everyday life, and whether they enable appropriation in the field of cultural production. Through interviews and participant observation with non-African-American women learning and teaching hip-hop dance, I capture a spectrum of participant views. Most dancers see hip-hop as African American in its origins. But while novices often speak of an inherent or learned authenticity among blacks, experts rarely express racialized views of the dance’s contemporary practice. Experts’ views are shaped by personal ability, exposure to dancers whose ability is not racially patterned, and exposure to others who accept their skill. How dancers act on these interpretations challenges common associations of racialized views with tolerance, and non-racialized views with appropriation.
“Organizing Workers Along Ethnic Lines: The Pilipino Workers’ Center.” Pp. 49-70 in R. Milkman, J. Bloom, and V. Narro (eds.) Working for Justice: The L.A. Model of Organizing and Advocacy. (2010) Cornell University Press. [link to book chapter]
Introduction: Worker centers often attract members who share a geographic area or ethnic background—rather than an occupation or industry––and help them claim and expand their rights. Working predominantly with immigrants who crosscut industries, these centers are attuned to members’ problems not only at work but also in other domains such as immigration and housing (Fine 2006, 13, 20-22). This chapter examines how building a membership along ethnic lines impacts a worker center’s campaigns. Previous scholars have shown that geographic or ethnic-based worker centers have been effective in directing work-related legislative campaigns (Gordon 2005) and in mobilizing for tenant and immigrant rights (Fine 2006). Because organizing along ethnic lines can be so consequential for a worker center––from determining its industry focus to establishing its organizational allies—I seek to delineate the impact of this organizing strategy on a center’s trajectory. Through an analysis of four campaigns at the Pilipino Workers’ Center (PWC), I trace how one organization implemented the ethnic organizing principle and the resulting support and setbacks it experienced.
“Strangeness at the Gates: The Peculiar Politics of American Immigration” (with Roger Waldinger). International Migration Review (2006) 40(3): 719-734. [link to review essay]
If you do not have free access to any of these publications, please email me for an electronic copy.